[MedicalConspiracies] ‘Cowgate’ Is Latest Global Warming Scandal

I  FART

4  COWS;-)))))
Bruce Chesley
Truth is a terrible cross to bear.
Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered. - Thomas Paine
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws - Tacitus
Treason for $$$$.  ALL "pro 2A" orgs.

 

Source:  http://www.newsmax.com

 

'Cowgate' Is Latest Global Warming Scandal

Another claim by global warming alarmists has been discredited — this time assertions about the role livestock play in producing greenhouse gases.

In 2006, a United Nations report entitled "Livestock's Long Shadow" claimed that "the livestock sector is a major player, responsible for        18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. This is a higher share than transport."

This led to demands for a "cow tax" in the U.S. and a campaign in Europe last year called "Less Meat = Less Heat," political commentator Gerald Warner points out in Britain's Daily Telegraph.

Now Dr. Frank Mitloehner, an air quality expert at the University of California at Davis, calls the U.N. report "scientifically inaccurate."

In a report to the American Chemical Society, he reveals that the U.N. added all greenhouse-gas emissions associated with meat production, including fertilizer production, land clearance, methane emissions, production of feed, milk processing, and vehicle use on farms, to get the highest possible result.

But the transport figure included only the burning of fossil fuels, resulting in an "apples and oranges analogy that truly confused the issue," Mitloehner disclosed.

In fact, just 3 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. are attributable to the raising of cows and pigs, compared to 26 percent from transport, according to Mitloehner.

"It is becoming difficult to keep pace with the speed at which the global warming scam is now unraveling," Warner writes, noting that the Washington Times has called the latest flap "Cowgate."

"Himalayan glaciers, polar bears, Arctic ice, Amazon rainforests, all discredited."

One of the authors of the U.N. report, Pierre Gerber with the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization, told the BBC he accepted Mitloehner's criticism: "I must say honestly that he has a point — we factored in everything for meat emissions, and we didn't do the same thing with transport."