Sep 9, 2011

MedicalConspiracies- Chemtrails Exposed

According to all United States federal government organizations,
chemtrails do not exist and/or are a conspiracy theory. They say the
white lines in the sky stretching from horizon to horizon are normal
jet contrails. Somehow, I assume using theoretical physics, these
contrails can first appear as small white lines high in the sky then,
over the course of hours, expand as they float down to earth first
creating small clouds and finally a haze. Because this is exactly what
is happening.

They were spraying us something fierce today above San Francisco. They
often do it before a weather front coming in. Lines in every
direction, a big X in the sky and then the inevitable haziness.
Everybody saw it. Many people knew what it was. Many do not want to
realize it, so they may never. If you want to be a good slave, I'm
sure you will bend over and take the easy way out. I don't appeal to
the slave. I appeal to the person who has the courage to stand up for
humanity and accept themselves as the only authority. I suggest that
you read the following exposé and ask the tough questions about what
OUR government says is NOT happening.

A typical chemtrail appears as a white line in the sky. These lines
become diffuse as they float down to earth. Heavy spraying creates a
thick haze over vast areas. Often, in certain areas of the country,
you will see grid patterns in the sky formed by chemtrails. If you
watch closely, you will see that these white lines in the sky come
from passing jets. The fact that these exhausts persist means that
they are of particulate matter. Contrails are unaduIterated and
typically disappear within 2 minutes, while chemtrails can linger for
hours. The word 'chemtrail' is derived from the word 'contrail.' At
the time of this writing, chemtrails are appearing almost every day
above San Rafael and San Francisco. By most accounts, chemtrail
spraying became nationally prevalent in the mid 1990's. There is a
political grouping among affected nations; almost all are NATO
members. There is reportedly no spraying in South America, China or
Russia, etc..

Circumstantial Evidence:
'Geoengineers' propose spraying megatons of toxins into the atmosphere
utilizing jet airplanes. They say it can save us from global warming.
They don't admit that it is currently happening, they just say it
might be good. Many people calling themselves geoengineers have
appeared on many television and Internet broadcasts proposing this
activity. Geoengineering is similar to 'cloud seeding' (which also
pollutes our environment), but it is something new in that different
materials are disbursed and it is on a much bigger scale. The 'Father
of the Hydrogen Bomb,' Edward Teller is widely recognized for his
early work in the field. United States Science Czar John Holdren and
University of Calgary professor David Keith are currently the most
prominent proponents. Mr. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book called
'Ecoscience' in which he advocates population reduction.

The Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER), an
organization funded by Mr. Bill Gates, gives grants to the University
of Calgary. FICER proposes "...adding reflective aerosols (small
particles suspended in air) to the stratosphere..." Mr. Bill Gates is
a population reduction advocate.

Many United States patents describe how substances can be disbursed
through airplane spray nozzles. One of the the most important patents
is U.S. Patent #5003186 'Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction
of Global Warming' which was filed by the Hughes Aircraft Corporation
in 1991. The Hughes Aircraft Corporation is now a division of
Raytheon. Another is U.S. Patent #3899144 'Powder Contrail Generation'
assigned to the United States Navy which was filed on July 22, 1974.

The 1996 U.S. Air Force research paper 'Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025' was produced by the Department of Defense
and written as "...a study designed to comply with a directive from
the chief of staff of the Air Force." This report explains how
spraying stuff into the atmosphere with airplanes is good and how our
military might go about doing this.

The United Nations backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
issued a 1999 report with a cover photo of three jet planes flying in
formation and emitting trails entitled 'Aviation and the Global
Atmosphere.' This report contained chapters titled, "Aviation-Produced
Aerosols and Cloudiness" and "Modeling the Chemical Composition of the
Future Atmosphere."

The Council on Foreign Relations has issued many publications about
geoengineering. Their 2008 paper entitled 'Unilateral Geoengineering:
Non-technical Briefing Notes for a Workshop at the Council on Foreign
Relations' proposes spraying fine particles into the stratosphere.

The U.K. Royal Society published a 2009 report titled 'Geoengineering
the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty' in which they
propose geoengineering and state, "A wide range of types of particles
could be released into the stratosphere with the objective of
scattering sunlight back to space."

The British House of Commons collaborated with the United States House
of Representatives Science and Technology Committee to release a
report on March 10, 2010 entitled 'The Regulation of Geoengineering'
in which they advocate "...the release of large quantities of aerosols
into the atmosphere."

Aurora Flight Sciences published a 2010 cost analysis study prepared
under contract to the University of Calgary entitled 'Geoengineering
Cost Analysis' which stated, "The goal of this study is to use
engineering design and cost analysis to determine the feasibility and
cost of a delivering material to the stratosphere for solar radiation
management (SRM)." [sic] In this report, the authors write about
utilizing different kinds of aircraft, including blimps, to spray
stuff into the atmosphere.

Ted Gunderson (former head of the Los Angeles, Dallas and Memphis FBI)
claims to have witnessed huge, unmarked chemtrail spraying planes on
the ground at the Lincoln, Nebraska Air National Guard facilities. He
also says that chemtrail spraying planes operate out of Fort Sill

A name that comes up a lot is Evergreen Aviation. They are a private
aviation services company based in McMinnville, Oregon. They have a
website. They describe themselves as, "a global leader providing
quality and reliable total aviation support services." They also have
extensive operations at the Pinal Airpark in Marana, Arizona. Pinal
Airpark and Evergreen Aviation have extensive ties to the CIA. During
the Vietnam War, Pinal Airpark served as the base of operations for
the known CIA front companies Air America, Air Asia and Intermountain
Airlines. In 1975, Intermountain Airlines was bought by Evergreen

The 2008 feature film 'Toxic Skies' starring Anne Heche is a fictional
drama involving chemtrails.

Local professional news reporters around the nation have investigated
and/or made mention of the phenomenon many times.

There has been formal discussion of chemtrails in the New Zealand

Multi-term Arizona state senator Karen Johnson has been an outspoken

U.S. congressman Dennis Kucinich used the word 'chemtrails' in
proposed national legislation. The word appeared in the 'Space
Preservation Act of 2001.' On September 10, 2002 the City Council of
Berkeley, California, in support of Congressman Kucinich's Space
Preservation Act, enacted Resolution #61744, declaring the space 60
kilometers and above Berkeley as a space-based weapons free zone. On
September 14th, Congressman Kucinich was officially presented the
resolution by Councilmember Dona Spring, who initiated the resolution
before 700 people in Wheeler Auditorium. The audience gave Kucinich
and Spring a standing ovation.

Victoria, British Columbia has declared itself a 'No-Fly Zone' for
chemtrail aircraft.

Third Senatorial District California State Senator Mark Leno responded
to a letter about chemtrails by stating, "I share your concerns about
anonymous toxins not only in the air we breathe, but also in the food
we eat and the water we drink."

Marin County Board of Supervisors, District 1 Representative Susan
Adams has voiced interest in chemtrail legislation, stating, "I will
continue to monitor your efforts and if there is federal legislation
or regulation being considered which the county can send a letter of
support for, please let me know."

There is a global grass roots political movement against chemtrails.
There are hundreds of thousands of independent eyewitness accounts on
the Internet. Millions of people are already fully chemtrail aware.
People from all walks of life around the world have come forward and
spoken out against chemtrails. I have documentation of airline pilots,
police officers, U.S. Marines, air traffic controllers, a senior Air
Traffic Control manager, Air Force tanker crews, scientists and more
speaking up.

This section is comprised of excerpts from the 2004 book 'Chemtrails
Confirmed' by William Thomas (Bridger House Publishers / ISBN
1-893157-10-5). William Thomas is an award winning Canadian
journalist. Thomas' writing and photography have appeared in more than
50 publications in eight countries, including translations into
French, Dutch and Japanese. His editorial commentaries have appeared
in The Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, The Vancouver Sun and Times-
Colonist newspapers. A frequent radio talk-show guest, William Thomas
has also appeared on the CBC and New Zealand's national television. He
currently lives and works among the Gulf Islands of British Columbia.

It was nearly noon when S.T. Brendt awoke and entered the kitchen of
her country home in Parsonfield, Maine. As she poured her first cup of
coffee, the late night reporter for WMWV radio could not guess that
her life was minutes away from drastic change.
Her partner Lou Aubuchont was already up, puzzling over what he had
seen in the sky a half hour before. The fat puffy plumes arching up
over the horizon were unlike any contrail he had ever seen, even
during his hitch in the Navy.
Lou got up and looked. What kind of clouds run exactly side-by-side in
a straight line? He wondered. It's just too perfect to happen
naturally. When he said he wasn't sure, S.T. stopped smiling and went
Looking up towards the southeast over West Pond, she spotted the first
jet. A second jet was laying billowing white banners to the north.
Both aircraft appeared to be over 30,000 ft. Turning her gaze due
west, Brendt saw two more lines extending over the horizon. She called
Lou. Within 45 minutes the couple counted 30 jets.
This isn't right, S.T. thought. We just don't have that kind of air
traffic here. While Lou kept counting, she went inside and started
calling airports. One official she reached was guarded but friendly.
He had relatives in West Pond.
The Air Traffic Control manager told Brendt her sighting was
"unusual". His radars showed nine commercial jets during the same 45-
minuite span. From her location, he said, she should have been able to
see one plane.
And the other 29? The FAA official confided off the record that he had
been ordered "by higher civil authority" to re-route inbound European
airliners away from a "military exercise" in the area. "Of course they
wouldn't give me any of the particulars and I don't ask," he
explained. "I just do my job."
Excited and puzzled by this information, S.T. and Lou got into their
car and headed down Route 160. Looking in any direction they could see
5 or 6 jets flying over 30,000 ft. Never in the dozen years they'd
lived in rural Maine, had they seen so much aerial activity. As a
former U.S. Navy intelligence courier, Aubuchont was used to large-
scale military exercises. But he told S.T. he had never seen anything
this big.
"It looked like an invasion," he later recounted. Another driver
almost went off the road as he leaned over his dashboard trying to
look up. As they passed, he acknowledged them with a nod.
As far as they could see stretched line after line. Two giant grids
were especially blatant. In stead of dissipating like normal
contrails, these sky trails grew wider and wider and began to merge.
Looking towards the sun, Aubuchont saw what looked like "an oil and
water mixture" reflecting a prismatic band of colors.
At approx. 3:55 they headed home to Parsonfield. They (the jets) were
still up there. What's worse is that these grids were now merging to
the point of greying their beautiful skies... By 5:30 their beautiful
day had turned dingy and hazy like air pollution and the sunset was
dirty. Lou remembers seeing the last jets at about 5:15 pm leaving
chemtrails. They were spaced further apart then the earlier jets.
Richard Dean called back. After receiving S.T.'s message, the
assistant WMWV news director had gone outside with other news staff
and counted 370 lines in skies usually devoid of aerial activity. The
most jets they could see at any one time was 17.
There is plenty of pattern and precedent for unannounced biowarfare
experiments on the American public. Two congressional investigations
in 1977 and 1994, as well as recently declassified British defense
documents, detail five decades of "open air" testing that spread
biological warfare simulants from spray-equipped ships and aircraft to
hundreds of cities and millions of unsuspecting taxpayers across the
U.S., Canada and the U.K.
Even as aerial atomic detonations were being conducted upwind of U.S.
cities to test the effects of fallout on unsuspecting residents, air-
borne biowarfare tests began in earnest in I957 and 1958 when a cargo
plane criss-crossed the country, spraying highly toxic zinc cadmium
sulfide chemicals.
A U.S. Army report states, "Virtually, the whole country of the United
States was covered with this material."
Prof. Leonard Cole testified at the first congressional investigation
into large area biowarfare experiments. The author of Clouds of
Secrecy described how:
"The plane would take off from the Canadian border, and fly slowly
down to the Gulf of Mexico. These materials would be spread, and were
found to be landing as far away as New York State. So you know that,
as the air would push the zinc cadmium particles around, most of the
people who were residents of the United States during that time were
inhaling at least some of the zinc cadmium sulfide. And the cadmium in
that compound was clearly known then to be toxic, even in small
Congress also learned that in 1953 the U.S. Army sprayed fluorescent
particles containing carcinogenic cadmium sulfide over 25-square-block
areas of downtown St. Louis, including what the army called a "slum
area". The U.S. Public Health Service's toxic chemical registry warns
that cadmium sulfide can lead to lung cancer, high blood pressure and
damage to the kidneys, lung, liver - as well as damaging the nervous,
reproductive and immune systems.
A story published by WorldNetDaily in 2001 - "Californians Concerned
Over Chemtrails" - was one of the first to take eyewitnesses
Reporter Lance Lindsay interviewed David Oglesby. Just after sun-down
two months previously, the World War II veteran spotted nearly a dozen
white trails, dissipating slowly over his home. "The trails formed a
grid pattern," Oglesby told Lindsay. "Some stretched from horizon to
horizon; some began abruptly and others ended abruptly. They hung in
the air for an extended period of time and gradually widened into
wispy clouds, resembling spider webs. I counted at least II different
Lindsay also examined dozens of photos taken over l2-months by Paula
Glick. Her father Gene Shimer served four years as a radar technician
during the Korean War. The retired U.S. Air Force sergeant does not
believe the patterns over his Coarsegold home are normal contrails.
"l was talking to my dad," Glick remembers, "and he said, 'They're
gridding us up here'. I thought, 'Yeah, right dad. Sure they are.' I
didn't believe him."
Four months after moving from Ventura to Coarsegold, Glick had to
reassess her father's assessment. "I had to watch them do it," Glick
told Lindsay. "And as I watched them everyday doing it, it became
apparent that we were being sprayed. And so I had to believe. I saw
what was normal and I saw what was abnormal."
Shimer contacted the Military Operation Control at Travis Air Force
Base, which controls all military operations in Central California.
Shimer asked the colonel to identify three planes flying over his home
at that very moment. "What would you say if I said there are three
aircraft up there right now?" Shimer asked. "Are they there?"
The colonel replied, "No. They are not there."
Navy operations told Shimer there were no operations at all. The
flight-control office at Fresno Yosemite International Airport said no
flight plans had been filed.
But lra Plumber is a retired lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Air Force
who regularly watches the sky over his Coarsegold home. Several times
a week, he sees planes emitting significant sky trails that do not
appear to be normal contrails, Plumber says.
As Lindsay chronicles:
One morning, about two years ago, Shimer spotted a long, thin string
resembling a spider web floating in the sky, he said. It was about 20
feet in length and could only be seen in the reflection of the sun. He
looked up, saw trails, and then saw something that appeared to be a
glob of foam falling from the sky. "It came floating down, free-
floating," Shimer says. "I caught it with a spatula, scooped it off
the ground, and I watched it as it shrank. It was about the size of my
fist when it first started. It looked like a cross between soap
bubbles and cotton candy." He placed the substance in a plastic bag
and kept it. It is now about the size of his thumbnail, he says. It
has hardened' now appearing to be made of plastic. He did not have it
lab tested. He doesn't have enough faith in any lab to give them his
only sample, he says. He believes it is probably polymer.
Dave Dickie's World Landscapes company performs contract landscape
work for the City of Edmonton. "Some contracts require us to utilize
the services of environmental labs for soil tests," says Dickie.
"Recent soils analysis have come back with a high EC rating 4:l
(toxic) and we've had some soil sources rejected of course they did
not meet specifications."
In an interview with me on Nov. 23, 2002, Dickie explained that city
landscape crews were finding widespread nutrient deficiency soils
could cause severe problems for plant life - including trees.
"'Wait," I interrupted. "Aluminum sucks nutrients from the soil."
"No question" answered this soil expert. Moreover, added Dickie when
measuring the electrical conductivity in Edmonton soil sample "city
specifications call for a reading no higher than 1."
Dickie's crews are now finding readings from 4.6 as high as 7.
The "chlorosis" condition resulting from this drastically high
electrical conductivity in soil was impacting their landscaping
business, Dickie explained. "We were not able to determine the cause
of the EC [electrical conductivity], and many reasons are possible."
Presuming that unusual metal content in the soil could be causing the
high readings, Dickie obtained samples of a fresh snowfall in sterile
containers and took them to NorWest Labs in Edmonton. As explained,
"Our most recent snowfall was tested for aluminum and barium and we
were not surprised with the results. You've said it all and this just
substantiates some of your claims."
In Nov. 2002, lab tests of snow samples collected by the city of
Edmonton, Alberta between Nov. 8 - 12, confirmed elevated levels of
aluminum and barium. NorWest Labs lab report #336566 dated Nov. 14,
2002 found: aluminum levels at 0.148F milligrams/litre and barium
levels of 0.006 milligrams/litre.
Because aluminum is ubiquitous in the environment, and its chemistry
depends on soil pH and mineralogical composition, it is difficult to
provide generalized estimates of natural background concentrations.
But according to Dickie, the NorWest Lab techs told him, "That's
interesting. Elevated levels of aluminum and barium are not usually
found in Alberta precipitation."
"It may not prove that the aluminum came from atmospheric programs,"
Dickie admits. "However
we are going to sample precipitation from various areas within a 40
mile radius of the City of Edmonton to determine aluminum/barium
within precipitation."
Dickie says it's simple to test for aluminum and barium in soil
samples. Labs typically charge about $15 for these tests. I suggested
he add quartz to the list of chemtrail fallout components to check
for. In Espanola, quartz predominated rainfall samples, which also
showed hazardous levels of aluminum.
Though it must be emphasized that neither Dickie nor NorWest Labs are
making any claims regarding these early test results, the correlation
of known chemtrail chemistry with Edmonton's soil samples is
This was hot. But imagine my shock when Dickie told me that he
regularly visits Air Traffic Control at the Edmonton municipal airport
and watches the chemplanes making repeated passes over the city!
"I've been a plane spotter all my life," Dickie explained. Blessed
with good friends at work in the tower, he has watched radar-
identified KC-135s "on many occasions."
Last Father's Day (2002), Dickie and an excited group of 12 year-olds
watched two sorties by two KC-135s. Petro 011 and Petro 012 were
tracked by radar as HA (High Altitude) targets flying at 34,000 and
36,000 feet - "one to the south, and one to the north of the city."
Both USAF tankers had flown south out of Alaska. As Dickie, the kids
and the controllers watched, the big jets began making patterns over
Edmonton - "circuits" the controllers called it. The Stratotankers
were working alone in "commanded airspace" from which all other
aircraft were excluded.
And they were leaving chemtrails.
"The signature is significant," commented one radar operator,
referring to a trail clearly visible on the scope extending for miles
behind the KC-135. In contrast, a JAL flight on the display left no
Going outside, Dickie and several controllers scanned clear blue
skies. They easily located the KC-135 leaving its characteristic white-
plume "signature". Visibility was outstanding. They also clearly saw
the JAL airliner at a similar flight level. It left no contrail at
On other occasions, Dickie has watched KC-135s on Edmonton radar
leaving lingering trails as low as 18,000 feet.
"We see these guys up here a lot," Dickie says radar techs told him.
The tanker flights originate in Alaska, grid the Edmonton area, and
continue on into the States.
On Sunday Feb. 16, 2003, the mass circulation Greek newspaper Ethnos
headlined its lead story: "Scientists Uneasy: Dangerous experiments in
the Greek skies".
The story's subheading must have turned a few heads: "American
aircraft are spraying the atmosphere with chemicals with a view to
creating an artificial cloud as an 'antidote' to the Greenhouse
The story by Giannis Kritikos described a vote by the Aigina Island
town council to ask the Greek government to explain what is happening
in the skies over Greece.
A picture taken from Chemtrails Confirmed was used to illustrate
similar phenomenon observed over Aigina "without any warning" two
months previously.
The translated caption read: "The white trails left behind by this
tanker plane which is used normally for aerial refueling, is not smoke
but a cloud of chemicals which provide scientists with the ability to
control the climate in an entire geographic region."
A photograph of Leonidas Kardaras, an environmental chemist with a
master's degree in environmental technology was paired with a shot of
Katsaros from the Democritus research centre in Athens, with the
inscription: "The two scientists point out to our correspondent the
dangers to public health entailed in the specific experiments."
A third photo showed former parliamentarian Tasia Andreadaki asking,
"Who gave permission for this spraying?" The story noted that Katsaros
had been invited to speak about chemtrails on Greek national
television a few mornings later.
The following unedited transcript is a recorded message from a Dec. 8,
2000 call by a Canadian aviation authority from the Victoria
International Airport to a local resident.
Stewart was responding to a call the previous day demanding to know
why intense aerial activity had left lingering X's, circles and grid-
like plumes over the British Columbia capitol on Dec. 6 and 7.
"Mark, it's Terry Stewart, Victoria Airport Authority. Just calling
you back from your comment. From what I gather, it's a military
exercise; U.S. and Canadian air force exercise that's goin' on. They
wouldn't give me any specifics on it. Hope that helps your interest.
Very odd. Thanks a lot. Bye bye now."

All this and much, much more can be found in William Thomas'
groundbreaking book 'Chemtrails Confirmed' available at his website Click on the 'bookstore' tab and you will be
taken to a page where you can order a copy of 'Chemtrails Confirmed,'
download an electronic copy of 'Chemtrails Confirmed' or order the
'Chemtrails Confirmed' companion DVD which contains a copy of
William's documentary video 'Mystery Lines in the Sky'. You can find
all this and more at

Scientific Evidence:
Hundreds of independent lab test results from around the world too
numerous to mention here have formed a consensus. The main ingredients
in chemtrails are aluminum, barium and strontium. As you are about to
see, professional scientists have corroborated these findings.

Frances Mangels has a Bachelor of Science in Forestry from the
International School of Forestry at Missoula, spent 35 years with the
U.S. Forest Service as a wildlife biologist and worked several years
with the USDA Soil Conservation Service as a soil conservationist.
Today he lives in Mt. Shasta, CA and works as a master gardener. He
took a sample of water from his backyard rain gauge on Feb. 1, 2009
and submitted it to Basic Laboratory of Redding, CA on Feb. 2, 2009.
This sample showed aluminum at a level of 1010 micrograms per liter
(ug/l). This same sample also showed barium at a level of 8 ug/l.
Using the same sample method and laboratory, he took a sample on Oct.
14, 2009 which showed aluminum at a level of 611 ug/l. The barium
should not be there in any amount. Chemtrails have been known to
consist of both barium carbonate and barium oxide. Barium carbonate is
used in rat poison. The normal level of aluminum in rainwater is .5 ug/
l. These samples show levels of aluminum at 2020 times and 1222 times
the normal levels. There is no heavy industry in the Mt. Shasta area.
There is no reason, other than chemtrails, for this stuff to be
showing up at these levels.

Mr. Mangles writes on Oct. 30, 2009:
"The soil scientists from the USDA Soil Conservation Department
visited private property east of Shasta Lake, California, on Oct. 27,
2009. Mr. Bailey, Komar, and Owens tested the pH with standard federal
meters. All agreed the pH should be 5.5.
Under Douglas fir, the ph was 7.4, astoundingly basic for that
Under Poderosa pine, at the precise soil-needle interface, I would
expect a pH of 5. At that point, Bailey's meter showed 6.5. This is
high for a microhabitat that should be very acid. Old soil surveys
indicate this soil should be very acid, around pH of 5.5.
I bought a house in Mt. Shasta old black oak/pine pasture in 2002,
tested the pH at below 6, good for vegetable gardening. It was a major
reason for purchase, and proceeded with highly acid composting of
leaves and grass to drive the pH down or at least keep it low, as
every master gardener knows. I added a touch of sulphur and avoided
wood ash to insure acidity, and proceeded to teach organic gardening
courses out of my yard through COS. The pH tests were an embarrassment
because now my garden is pH 7, sometimes higher. This is the opposite
of what should happen.
The pH meter of Jon McClellan proceeded to show pH in McCloud gardens
also running close to 7 or 8, which is too high for heavy organic
mulch with no ashes. General lawns were also running over pH 7 under
oaks and pines and fir trees. This is contrary to everything I learned
in college and the Soil Conservation Service for 35 years. The old
data sheets say these soils should be running at a pH of 5-6.
I tested my rainwater in a plastic NWS rain gauge set high on a pole,
and got 1010 ug/l aluminum, with substantial amounts of barium and
strontium included, where it should be non-detectable. Others from the
West Coast have similar repeated results, from the Bay Area to

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) produced data
showing elevated levels of barium in surface water between 1988-2004.
Along with other elevated readings, a sample from the East Verde River
near Payson, AZ taken on July 19, 1999 showed barium at a level of 340
micrograms per liter (ug/l). This is significant because, unlike
aluminum, barium is not commonly found in our soils and water.

The ADEQ analyzed many water samples taken at different times from the
Nogales Wash Channel between 1993 and 2002. Among other elevated
readings, they found barium at levels of: 850 ug/l, 950 ug/l and 900

The ADEQ analyzed many water samples taken at different times between
1988-2004 at the Verde River Below Horseshoe Dam. Among many other
elevated readings, a sample taken on July 19, 1990 showed barium at a
level 560 ug/l and another sample taken within a year showed barium at
a level of 700 ug/l.

In June of 1996, the ADEQ analyzed water samples taken from the
Buckeye Canal. The lab report showed barium at a level of 570 parts
per million.

In July of 1999, the ADEQ sampled water from the Little Colorado River
Basin and found aluminum at 150,000 ug/l or 150 mg/l or .15 g/l. This
reading is made even more interesting by the fact that in September of
2002 AND in March of 2005, the ADEQ tested the same river basin and
found NO aluminum. What accounted for this giant aluminum spike?

As far as water contamination is concerned, I must report that a lot
of available data which would otherwise support the chemtrail
hypothesis is misleading and unreliable. The data to which I am
referring is that which comes from the California Department of Public
Health Drinking Water Program (CDPHDWP). Online, this organization is
also referred to as the California Department of Health Sciences
Drinking Water Program. The CDPHDWP produces and distributes publicly
a data CD entitled 'California Drinking Water Data'. This CD purports
to represent toxicology data collected from all California water
districts. The problem is that, after checking with my local water
districts and the CDPHDWP, it is apparent that the data contained in
this CD is very unreliable. My local water districts tell me that this
is because the CDPHDWP is using an outdated data collection method.
Furthermore, websites which use this data as support for the chemtrail
hypothesis miss the point that the data CD in question represents (and
poorly so) PROCESSED DRINKING WATER when we should be looking at
UNPROCESSED or 'SURFACE WATER' (the water found in reservoirs). Online
you will find many graphs based on data contained in the CDPHDWP data
CD showing incredible levels of many different toxins. All these
graphs are not to be trusted without a local water department
confirmation and even in that case, the data is not wholly pertinent.

Data produced by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) shows
elevated levels of chemtrail toxins. Between 1990 and 2002, CARB
ambient air statewide average data shows elevated and increasing
levels of aluminum and barium. From 1990 to 2002, aluminum was
detected in the range of 1500 to 2000 nanograms per cubic meter.
Barium, which between 1990 and 2002 consistently trended upwards,
reached a peak of 50.8 nanograms per cubic meter in 2002. The CARB
classifies aluminum and barium as toxic compounds. The CARB website
says, "For toxics compounds, there is generally no threshold
concentration below which the air is healthy. For toxics compounds,
the greater the quantified health risk, the more unhealthy the air
is." In other words, ANY aluminum or barium is unhealthy. There ARE NO
SAFE LEVELS except zero. Remember, these are STATEWIDE AVERAGES. God
forbid you might be living in an area that increased the average.

You may ask why I am only referencing data up to 2002. This is 2011.
Where is the missing data? The answer is that data from between 1990
and 2002 is the only data which the CARB has widely distributed. As
far as statewide averages for ambient aluminum and barium are
concerned, these years are the only years which their website and
their 'California Ambient Air Quality Data' DVD show. Their Public
Information Officer Dimitri Stanich curiously refused to answer
questions about the missing data. He referred me to documents which
did not address the issue. After discussions with staff, Mike Miguel,
the chief of the Quality Management Branch of the Monitoring and
Laboratory Division, wrote me saying, "It is my understanding that the
toxics air monitoring network (samples collected in Summa canisters)
stoped analyzing for these compounds due to the low concentrations. 
However, the PM2.5 network does analyze for these compounds and that
data was provided in the analyses and CD." [sic] A statewide average
of barium at 50.8 nanograms per cubic meter and aluminum at 2000 are
low concentrations? Any levels of detectable aluminum or barium have
been classified as unhealthy. The concentrations were trending
upwards. They stopped analyzing for these compounds? I have scoured
their website, written letters and made many phone calls to the CARB
and I have not heard of or seen this missing data presented in any CD.
Thankfully, other people have been asking for this missing data as
well. The organization known as Environmental Voices requested the
missing data and on September 15, 2010 they got it. Amazingly, after
data showing many years of elevated and increasing levels of aluminum
and barium, this newly produced data showed MUCH LOWER levels. That's
good news, right? I want to believe that everything is as it has
always been. The only problem is that, upon scrutiny of the numbers,
you will find that the newly released data contradicts the previously
released data.

Let us look at data for the year 2002 both new and old. 2002 is a year
for which the CARB widely distributed data AND it is a year for which
they have provided data to only a select few researchers such as I due
to the efforts of Environmental Voices. I will refer to the widely
distributed data as the 'old' data and the thinly distributed data as
the 'new' data. The old data says that in 2002 the statewide average
for ambient aluminum was 1980 nanograms per cubic meter. The new data
says that the statewide average in 2002 was 67.5 nanograms per cubic
meter. The new data also says that statewide average aluminum
concentrations generally remained at this level through to 2009. As
far as barium goes, the old data says that the statewide ambient air
average barium concentration for 2002 was 50.8 nanograms per cubic
meter. The new data says it was 27.5 nanograms per cubic meter. The
new data says that statewide average barium concentrations only
trended lower from 2002 to 2009. Why does the new data contradict the
old data?

Are certain people at the CARB trying to hide something? Why does
their Public Information Officer, whose job is to answer questions
from the public, refuse to answer questions about missing data? Why
does he obfuscate the truth by referring me to documents that don't
answer the question? Why does one of their division chiefs' response
not make sense? How is it that data released to only a select few
magically makes the problem go away? Why don't they post this new data
on their website? All their answers so far only leave me with more

Again, there are hundreds, maybe thousands of other scientific
confirmations of chemtrail toxins available. I have left those out in
favor of only the most reputable data. Although the next logical
subject would be the health effects of exposure to chemtrail toxins, I
do not feel the need to write about that. Aside from the fact that it
is difficult to prove; I don't need to tell you that. I don't need to
tell you that breathing particulate toxins all day and night is bad
for you. I don't need to tell you that adding to the myriad of toxins
in our food, water and air is bad for us. We know it is. There are
many scientific papers supporting this position, but it is just common
sense. We need to reduce the amount of toxins in our ecosystem, not
increase them.

There are fleets of jumbo jet aircraft which have been retrofitted to
spray megatons of toxic substances over populations in most Western
countries. They swarm over different areas at different times. The
planes are flown by remote control because pilots are a liability. It
is common knowledge that jumbo jets can be flown as drones. It is a
military operation directed from an unknown location, but I speculate
that it is conducted (at least in America and Canada) from NORAD
command at Peterson AFB, Colorado Springs, CO under direction of a
Western intelligence agency such as the C.I.A.. The planes are
retrofitted at Pinal Airpark in Marana, Arizona by Evergreen Aviation
under the supervision of Hughes Aircraft. There has been speculation
about chemtrails being produced by additives in the jet fuel of
commercial passenger airliners. I do not believe this is the case. The
mechanical problems would be insurmountable. Spiking the jet fuel with
particulate matter would damage jet engines. Spiking the jet fuel
would also greatly limit the variety of materials used.

The reasons why are not clear. Their cover story of saving us all from
Global Warming is too thin to be the real reason. Speculative reasons
are: depopulation, making us dependent upon chemtrail resistant GMO
seeds and crops, military surveillance purposes, facilitation of the
H.A.A.R.P. weapon, facilitation of Project Blue Beam, the hiding of
celestial events, and others. The most logical reason, depopulation,
is almost too dark for my good mind to accept.

I speculate chemtrail spraying operations are funded by the citizenry
of Western nations through their central banks; most notably the
United States Federal Reserve Bank.

You and I are being sprayed. Your family and mine are being sprayed.
Your friends and mine are being sprayed. Our entire ecosystem and
every living thing therein are being destroyed. The chemtrail
phenomenon is nothing short of genocide. Whether or not that was the
intention, that is exactly what it is. I have now proven to you that
chemtrails are real. Do not live in denial. Denial equals death. Our
collective ignorance is what is killing this society. Ignorance causes
chemtrails. I ask that you reverse this trend. Ask the questions.
Demand answers. I have armed you with the verifiable truth; now go out
there and shake the trees. Call and write your local office of: the
Federal Aviation Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency,
the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the California Air
Resources Board, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment,
the Department of Toxic Substances Control, ALL your government
representatives, talk radio shows, and television stations. You are
the one you have been waiting for. Thank you.

-'Chemtrails Confirmed' by William Thomas (book) 2004 Bridger House
-U.S. Patent #5003186 Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of
Global Warming 1991
-'Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the weather 2025' (Air Force
research paper) 1996
-'Aviation and the Global Atmosphere' (Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change report) 1999
-'Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and
Uncertainty' (report by The U.K. Royal Society) 2009
-'The Regulation of Geoengineering' (British House of Commons / U.S.
House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee report) 2010
-'Unilateral Geoengineering: Non-technical Briefing Notes for a
Workshop at the Council on Foreign Relations', Washington DC, May 05,
-'Geoengineering Cost Analysis' by Aurora Flight Sciences (report)
-'Space Preservation Act of 2001' H.R. 2977
-'Resolution in Support of the Space Preservation Act and the Space
Preservation Treaty to Permanently Ban the Weaponization of
Space' (2002) City of Berkeley Resolution no. 61744
-'What in the World Are They Spraying?' by Michael Murphy, Paul
Wittenberger and G. Edward Griffin (video) 2010 Truth Media
-'Aerosol Crimes' by Clifford Carnicom (video) 2005*
*Available for free on YouTube


To subscribe:
Alternative Medicine info:

"ClayAdvantage" The Gift of Health
Holistic Store:

Information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related,
speculation or opinion. Consult with a qualified MD before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.
FDA and FTC have not evaluated or endorsed any message or product from this group.